GAME Plan

As a physical education teacher I have not spent much time with technology standards.  In previous courses I have skimmed over them but never really broke down what they actually meant to me.  I figured out that some of these indicators I already do without much trouble but there are plenty of them that I could improve upon.  The two for me I posted below.

1. Facilitate and Inspire Student Learning and Creativity

d. model collaborative knowledge construction by engaging in learning with students, colleagues, and others in face-to-face and virtual environments.

5. Engage in Professional Growth and Leadership

b. exhibit leadership by demonstrating a vision of technology infusion, participating in shared decision making and community building, and developing the leadership and technology skills of others

Goals-My goal is to become better at using technology on a daily basis.  I would like to be able to use technology on a weekly basis to collaborate with my colleagues and students.  I would like to become a leader with technology so that I can share ideas with the people in my building.

Action-“That is, when used as a support and resource for the communicative processes of teaching and learning, the computer can be used to increase creative  thinking processes among groups and communities(Cennamo, Ross, & Ertmer, 2009, p.70).”  I want to set up a couple blogs or wikis that I could use with my colleagues to communicate with.  The other I would like my students to be able to access to answer question that I post.  We do a good job as a faculty of using email but I think we could really get more done with the use of these other options.  I am interested to see if anyone has any information to make this transition easier. 

Monitor-I will monitor the progress by watching the traffic on the blogs.  We will see how many people are using the blogs to communicate with each other.  I can make my students use it by assigning homework to be down by answering on the blog.

Evaluate-If the students are using the blogs to communicate with me I will be able to mark it down in the grade book.  I would like to have a hundred percent participation but know that this can be difficult with some students not having internet access.  What can be done with these students?  It’s a little harder to make the staff use this but would hope that if we make it worth their while that they would want to participate.  That is where the burden falls on my shoulders with the help of some of the other technology savvy teachers. 

I still have a long way to go before I am anywhere near savvy with technology.  Every day through this class I become a little better and hope that with some insightful thoughts from my peers that I can continue to grow.  I am looking forward to your critiques and hope that I can also help you out as well.

Reference     

Cennamo, K., Ross, J. & Ertmer, P. (2009). Technology integration for meaningful classroom use: A standards-based approach. (Laureate Education, Inc., Custom ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.

International Society for Technology in Education. (2008). National education standards for teachers (NETS-T). Retrieved on September 13, 2011 from http://www.iste.org/Libraries/PDFs/NETS_for_Teachers_2008_EN.sflb.ashx.

Final Reflection for Bridging Learning Theory and Instruction

I cannot believe our class is drawing to a close.  It seems like just yesterday that I was listening to Dr. Orey talk about instructional theory vs. learning theory.  I can honestly say that I did not have the faintest idea about either of these theories.  Now a mere seven weeks later I can have an intelligent conversation with someone explaining the difference between the two.   

The main thing I took from the class is about the role of the learner.   “All four of the theories are based on having an active learner in the classroom.  Children have to be active in the learning process regardless of the learning theory that we incorporate.” (Laureate 2008)  I think that this after finishing this course personal learning theory has been strengthened even more.  I always tried to get the students to be active in the process.  Now I make a more conscious effort and try to find ways for them to act as the teacher.

I learned that educational technology integration is not just me using an active board in front of the students to demonstrate something.  I have to let them use it if they are to get any real sustenance from the activity.  Two technology tools I would like to implement into my classroom would be the use of pedometers to measure the amount of steps students takes.  It is recommended that we take ten thousand steps a day.  I think if I had them track their progress and then put their information in an excel spreadsheet they would really enjoy this. The other technology would have to do with orienteering.  This is a sport that helps students with navigational skills using maps, compasses, and now GPS. Teach them how to read maps and properly use the GPS while exercising by walking to the next destination around the school grounds.

My long-term goal for integrating technology into my instructional practices would be to not overdo it.  I know this sounds strange in a time when the big push is to get technology into everything.  As a PE teacher some technology as I have mentioned can be beneficial to adding depth to a class.  However there are other times when good old fashioned basketball or kickball without a computer screen hooked up is really good for them.  I have noticed that there are times when I pull out a technology and the students groan because they have it shoved down their throat too much.  I am going to try and find a happy medium for when I use technology in my gymnasium to supplement a lesson.

I did not really know what to write for this fourth step paragraph.  All it said to do was copy and paste the URL for my blog into a word document and submit it to the instructor. I went back and looked at the instructions for this final reflection and it says to be sure to have a total of six paragraphs with an intro, conclusion, and one for each of the four steps.  I was not sure how I was going to get a fourth paragraph about my URL but I thought I would give it a try. After submitting this to my blog I will make sure to paste it here.

I learned a lot in this class about the theories behind how students learn.  The most important thing I take away from this is that I need to try and get my students involved in the learning.  Nothing is more important than having an engaged and active learner.  It will be my job to help the student get there.  I need to not stifle them but rather give them the opportunities to teach others what is expected.

Reflection:

 Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2008). Instructional Theory vs. Learning  Theory Baltimore: Author.         

Voice Thread

http://voicethread.com/share/1905537/

Check out which food pyramid you think is the best.

Connectivism and Social Learning in Practice

This week we were taking a look at cooperative learning, specifically how we would get our students to do so with the means of technology.  “Cooperative learning focuses on having students interact with each other in groups in ways that enhance their learning”. (Pitler, Hubbell, Kuhn, Malenoski, 2007) We need to try and get our students to make connections with others while building a project.  The resources showed us some very useful ways to enhance their learning.

It first told us how to properly set up the groups for the most success.  One of the key points that I thought they made was to sparingly ability group.  This makes sense to me that when we are building our groups to put people with different strengths so that they can balance each other out.  The next thing it did was take us through a rundown of some nice web resources we can have our students use.  “Cooperative learning is not so much learning to cooperate as it is cooperating to learn”. (Wong & Wong, 1998)  We want them to be able to make connections with people that can help them better understand what they are trying to learn.  One very interesting resource they made me aware of was the JASON project.  This sparked my interest because my wife is a science teacher and this is an organization focused on engaging students in hands-on scientific discovery.  The students can get involved with real scientific discoveries that are going on right now.  They can watch live interviews with experts in the field or they can email them with specific questions.  I had to show my wife this and she was really excited to get her students involved with this.  I was also interested in the web-enabled multiplayer simulation games.  Whenever you can disguise learning in the form of a game it definitely helps reach some of those students that think they do not like learning.  It is interesting how students can interact with kids from another classroom or even another state while they learn about things like the American Revolution.  With the game Revolution “participants navigate the space of a town, interact with other players and townspeople, and have the opportunity to act in and react to various events that foreshadow the coming of the American Revolution”. (Pitler, Hubbell, Kuhn, Malenoski, 2007)  I thought the students would like to do this for a history assignment.   Being able to learn while gaming can really be beneficial to those students we have a hard time reaching.

References:

 Pitler, H., Hubbell, E.R., Kuhn, M., & Malenowski, K. . (2007). Using technology with classroom

instruction that works. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Wong, H. k., & Wong, R. T. (1998) How to be an effective teacher. The first days of school.             Mountain View, CA: Harry K. Wong Publications, Inc.

Constructivism in Practice....More Like ConstructioNism in Practice

Constructivism in Practice

                This week we have been studying about the constructivism learning theory.  I think it is interesting that we were supposed to write about constructivism instead of constructionism.   Dr. Orey states “constructivism is a theory of knowledge stating each individual actively constructs their own meaning. That this is not necessarily important for classroom teachers”.  (Laureate 2008)  He gave an example for this by saying if someone asked us about the word chair we would all picture something different.  This happens because we all had different experiences in our past with chairs.  Constructionism on the other hand is the learning theory that says “people learn best when they build an external artifact of something they can share with others”. (Laureate 2008)  This makes more sense to me as a classroom teacher because if we can get our students actively engaged in creating the project then they will better learn the content. 

                I said all that to say, “I think a better title for this week would be constructioNism in practice” since most of the chapter on “Generating and Testing Hypothesis” is about Mrs. Omar having her class generate spreadsheets for savings and investments.  Throughout the three different class scenarios they all have to do with students building an external artifact which is the definition of constructionism.  “When students generate and test hypotheses, they are engaging in complex mental processes, applying content knowledge like facts and vocabulary, and enhancing their overall understanding of the content.” (Pitler, Hubbell, Kuhn, Malenoski 2007)  The only way I had ever formerly thought about using hypothesis was during the scientific process.  Our students just wrapped up their science fair projects in which they had to then take the data they collected and use some type of technology to incorporate it into their project.  We saw this type of data collection happening in Mrs. Schwartz middle school science class and it reminded me of this.  But after studying the resources I now realize that we do not just use it during the scientific process but we also generate and test hypothesis on daily occurrences in other aspects of our lives. 

Resources:

  Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2008). Instructional Theory vs. Learning Theory Baltimore: Author.

Pitler, H., Hubbell, E.R., Kuhn, M., & Malenowski, K. . (2007). Using technology with classroom

instruction that works. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Blog Post Week 3: Cognitivism in Practice

              If we are going to make any correlation between the resources we read this week and cognitive learning theory we have to first understand what the basic principles of the theory are.  The basis is that we learn new things more easily if we have prior knowledge or better yet experiences to pull from.  We also learn from making connections so the more senses we can get involved in the leaning process the better chance it will stick in our long term memory.  Now when specifically talking about the resources and how they correlate with the theory we have to take a closer look at the resources themselves.  As I read through the chapters on “Cues, Questions, and Advance Organizers” and “Summarizing and Note Taking” I was thinking how similar they both are.  Chapter 4 states that “there is no one correct way to take notes. In fact, different students might prefer different not-taking formats.” (Marzano, Pickering, & Pollock, 2001).  One format we can use is to summarize something by actually putting it into an advanced organizer.  We are going to be helping our students do this in our application this week using the virtual field trip.  Since I teach PE I am going to have my students move through the human body and learn about some of the key systems that keep us going.  We will be using the advance graphic organizers to organize five systems of our bodies.  They will be pulling from prior experiences like perhaps a canoe trip they took with their families when we talk about the digestive system.  You “put in” the mouth and then go over a water fall down your esophagus into the stomach.  I also have a video that helps illustrate what the digestive system does that the students find hilarious and helps them make more connection.  I have really learned a lot that will hopefully help me help my students become better more efficient learners.     

References:

Marzano, Pickering, & Pollock (2001).  Classroom instruction that works. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

This video is an Awesome example of how food travels through the digestive system!!

Behaviorism in Practice

        When I opened the text this week and began reading I was not sure I was going to get anything of any real sustenance.  However, I discovered some really interesting information on how to show students the correlation between the effort they give and the grades they earn.  Technology makes it easier for students and teachers to track the effects of effort and facilitates more immediate feedback. (Pitler, H., Hubbell, E., Kuhn, M., & Malenoski, K., 2007)  When I read this passage I was wondering how they were going to get students to understand effort and to be able to track it.  After seeing what Ms. Powell had her fifth grade class do, I immediately went and showed my wife who herself teaches a fifth grade single gender male class.  It was truly thought provoking how she had the students track their effort during her weeks teaching decimals.  I really liked how she even had a scoring system set up that would show the students if their effort grade correlated with their math grade.  As a PE teacher I was thinking about coaching while I was reading this passage.  I am not a coach myself but I know coaches are always preaching about giving maximum effort at practice and during games.  This would be a great exercise to do with their players during a stretch of the season.  They could easily track the level of effort the team gave to the results of the game.  We all know how coaches love statistics, this could be another one. 

          As I read the next passage on homework I came across an Algebra teacher and a High school PE teacher or worked together to graph data that was collected by the football team.  The football team tracked their weightlifting program for the duration of the season.  At the end they compiled all the data they had and took it to algebra to make a parabolic graph.  I thought this was a very clever way to make math more meaningful.  This also was a good way for them to get more work outside of the school day.  Any extra practice a student receives is going to be beneficial as long as they are working on the correct information.  You cannot just give them work if they have not been shown the proper techniques and if we do not give them adequate feedback in a timely manner.  What good is it if we provide advice on something a week later if they have spent that entire week doing it wrong?  One problem I saw with what these teachers were doing was how they were helping all the rest of the students they see in a day.  Targeting the football team is fine but that only accounts for a handful of students.  I wonder if they thought of a way to do a similar thing with all of his PE classes. This would enable them to have all the students involved with the project.    

       I feel Both of these strategies correlate with the behaviorist learning theory.  The whole premise that we have to understand what is going on inside our students mind to better be able to serve them is at work.  We have to reinforce the behaviors we want.  If the students can physically see how their effort on homework or anything else can impact their school work I think they would continue to work hard.  If we also went and posted this information on the school website or somewhere in the building like the text mentioned it could very possibly push our students to keep giving their best.   

Reference:

Pitler, H., Hubbell, E., Kuhn, M., & Malenoski, K. (2007). Using technology with classroom instruction that

works. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.